2nd Post Just as Lame as The 1st

Well, now that I got my blog cherry popped, I have some thoughts. This weekend I saw both "Lady in the Water," and "Clerks II." Both of these films were amazing in my opinion and whomever I went to either of these films.

However, I've noticed something: M. Night Shamalan just might be the most hated director not named Uwe Boll. I e-mozied on over to the "Lady in the Water" IMDb page and was shocked to see that there were far more "This movie was horrible" or more likely, "This movie [performed fellatio on a donkey whilst pronouncing 'I'm a dirty girl, I'm a dirty girl]" had to clean up the language there, don't want to burnout my fuck and shit rations on the first night.

It seems the man's a love hate guy, for example my associate Matt and I loved "The Village," everyone else in the world--or those who scream the loudest--hated it. And I see more posts like "The movie was dumb I didn't get it..."---

Doesn't that mean you're dumb you waste of taxpayers money and breath for us with the big brains that need it?

Or "it's dumb it wasn't even scary"

it's a bedtime story you "Laguna Beach" enjoying mouth breather.

I don't get it, I think that his films are gorgeously shot (especially "The Village"); imaginative; thought provoking after the film; and they take fantastical scenarios and throw them into the real world.

I don't get what there'snot to love, maybe it's 'cause he's Indian.

However with the "Clerks II" front things are very different. They made an estimated 9.6-9.8 mil this weekend essentially doubling they're shooting budget of 5 million. However Joel Siegel the "Good Morning America" critic made a big fucking scene in the critic screening http://www.viewaskew.com/news/jul06/1.html

what a mustachioed knucklehead